"Employers simply can't afford to see this Baby Boomer generation retire en masse," says Roselyn Feinsod, principal at Towers Perrin HR Services in Stamford, CT, "without witnessing significant effects on productivity, the ability to serve customers and, ultimately, the bottom line."
According to a survey conducted by Towers Perrin, employees 55 and older were found to be more engaged and committed to their work than their younger colleagues. Workers in the 55-plus age group rated an "average motivation score" of 78 on a 100-point scale, ahead of those in younger age groups.
"Very few people are retiring in a traditional sense," says Carleen MacKay, practice leader for third careers at Ft. Lauderdale, FL-headquartered Spherion Corporation and co-author of "Boom or Bust! New Career Strategies in a New America." Financial issues, the need to stay mentally active, passion for their jobs and other factors are fueling workers' desires to stay on the job; gradually transitioning into full retirement.
In fact, in a survey of 1,000 workers and retirees at or near retirement age, conducted by Washington-based Watson Wyatt Worldwide, 33 percent of respondents said they would delay full retirement if their organization offered a phased retirement program.
MacKay recommends voluntary phased retirement plans to keep mature workers active and engaged, and to allow organizations "the time to transfer knowledge." Retaining that knowledge is a key issue, she says, given the sheer number of senior positions held by employees in this particular age group, and the vast amount of intellectual property companies stand to lose if not prepared for their departures.
Source: Human Resource Executive, March 22, 2006